Thursday
July 29, 2010


News
Calendar
Viewpoints
Editorials
Letters
Ken Trainor
Shrubtown
Lifelines
Sports
Journal Plus

Blogs

Community Guide
Special Sections

About Us
Feedback
Send us letters



Legal Notices






Search


Advanced Search

home : viewpoints : letters

3/18/2008 10:00:00 PM Email this articlePrint this article 
It's time to rethink For Sale signs

While reviewing yet another months' worth of dismal real estate market activity and sales figures, I think it may well be time to consider lifting the archaic "For Sale" sign ban. Previous arguments for and against seem irrelevant when considering that allowing a more level playing field between FSBOs [For Sale By Owners] and Realtors just might create an environment in which many sellers can actually leave the closing table with a check or at least avoid a short sale.


Many homeowners who have purchased property over the last few years with valuations at peak levels or with substantially high loan-to-value ratios would be the primary beneficiaries. Builders and rehabbers saddled with inventory may be able to discount an additional 5 or 6 points to cut a deal that would not substantially affect comparable market data, a very real problem in recent months. Sellers who have resided in their homes for quite a while could lower prices a bit in similar fashion.


I am not suggesting that real estate agents are unnecessary or financially burdensome. I have many professional brokers as friends and, if anything, the service they provide is more important now than ever. What I would like to see is a bit more parity between Realtors and sellers who are capable of selling their own homes. There are many online sources for sellers allowing multiple listing service access for a fee. Allowing tasteful, discreet real estate for sale signage would provide another appropriate sales tool.


Please do not respond with skewed statistics showing that for sale signs are not effective marketing tools. They are. I have sold at least 60 percent of our projects to folks who happened to see the sign. Panic peddling and blockbusting are, thankfully, things of the past.


I further suggest involving village government in creating an ordinance that suits everyone, something we all know the village does best. In that spirit, I suggest the following:


1) Fund a study. Spend precious local tax dollars having an outsider tell us what is good for us.


2) Schedule lots of meetings: Discuss it ad nauseum.


3) Neighborhood forums: "Design a sign" and hope your neighbor with the plastic lawn ornaments stays home.


4) Regulate it: There must be a page or two we can add to our rules and regulations.


5) Permit it: Another layer in the approval process and perhaps a sign committee or board of sorts.


6) FEE IT TO DEATH: I am most confident that the village would be more than happy to collect additional revenue. I can only assume this would be somehow tied to your selling price.


7) Enforce it: The fees can then be used to hire a "Signage enforcement officer" who can walk the neighborhoods writing citations and collect yet more revenue.


For fear of sounding cynical, all I would really like to see is an elimination of an ordinance that restricts my constitutional right to freedom of speech. I think most rational adults can understand that.


Ed Messina

LMS Residential, Galewood/Oak Park

 





Reader Comments


Posted: Sunday, March 23, 2008
Article comment by: Joel Schoenmeyer

The ban on "for sale" signs shouldn't be lifted because the real estate market is soft. Rather, it should be lifted because such a ban is clearly unconstitutional. The U.S. Supreme Court decided that over 30 years ago, in the 1977 case of Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Willingboro (Thurgood Marshall wrote the opinion).

There is no "smug liberal" exception to the First Amendment, so it's time for the ban to go. It can either go peacefully, or it can go when a homeseller sues the Village (and the local realtors who have conspired with the Village to make sure the ban stays in effect). When that happens, and the Village loses, Oak Park is going to have even more problems than it already does.


Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the Web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number and e-mail address are for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Name:
Telephone:
E-mail:
Passcode: This form will not send your comment unless you copy exactly the passcode seen below into the text field. This is an anti-spam device to help reduce the automated email spam coming through this form.

Please copy the passcode exactly
- it is case sensitive.
Message:
   






Copyright 2010, Wednesday Journal, Inc.,
141 S. Oak Park Ave., Oak Park, IL 60302, 708-524-8300

To view any of the publications owned and operated
by Wednesday Journal, Inc., click on the appropriate title.

Forest Park Review · Riverside Brookfield Landmark
Chicago Journal · Skyline · Austin Weekly News · Chicago Parent magazine


Copyright 2010, Wednesday Journal Inc.

Software © 1998-2010 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved